|
Post by duyuthinkysaurus on Aug 31, 2016 10:29:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nob on Aug 31, 2016 13:40:52 GMT
They should visit the local camp site and im sure they will spot the parts.
|
|
|
Post by pierre on Aug 31, 2016 15:30:06 GMT
I see he appears as having visited the site from time to time--but doesn't post.His posts in the past always seemed to stimulate the rest of us.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Aug 31, 2016 19:43:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nob on Sept 1, 2016 10:55:04 GMT
So yesterday we were in the fracture clinic to get the Mrs signed off. At the reception desk in front of us was a Polish kid with a broken arm. Now I always thought the NHS claimed the money for treatment from the patients country. The E111 was mentioned by the Polish lad and the receptionist said "Oh that doesn't matter". He seemed bewildered that everything was free, he's only been in the country three month. No wonder the NHS is struggling nobody gives a stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Sept 1, 2016 12:01:57 GMT
So yesterday we were in the fracture clinic to get the Mrs signed off. At the reception desk in front of us was a Polish kid with a broken arm. Now I always thought the NHS claimed the money for treatment from the patients country. The E111 was mentioned by the Polish lad and the receptionist said "Oh that doesn't matter". He seemed bewildered that everything was free, he's only been in the country three month. No wonder the NHS is struggling nobody gives a stuff. Someone does..........me!
|
|
|
Post by duyuthinkysaurus on Sept 1, 2016 13:57:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nob on Sept 1, 2016 14:38:23 GMT
They are trying to close the loopholes, best of luck with that.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Sept 1, 2016 16:27:08 GMT
|
|
|
Post by banjo on Sept 1, 2016 17:50:27 GMT
Every download is traceable, every remark posted on this forum is recorded somewhere. GCHQ has software that monitors and flags up keywords in data packets. I wonder how many idle staff the BBC has to devote to following up every flagged up download. They would need to apply for a court order to enforce every internet service provider to reveal the identity of each download. We're talking millions of downloads here.
On that website, the writer suggests that a pin would be a good idea. Oh please...Thick4rse.
It does affect me because we haven't had a tele since the storm in the south east on October 15th 1987, so we'll just cease watching BBC iPlayer catch up. Just like before iPlayer came along, we'll never miss what we don't have. I can't count the number of times we've browsed through the slurry tank of programmes on offer and stifled a familiar yawn. It's not as though it affects "4 on demand" and the like either, so this "initiative" has broken the principle of licensing the premises with the equipment because it is apothecating the revenue specifically for the BBC. The government can sit on the rough end of a pineapple and rotate.
As usual, it only affects the law abiders. Just think, you can watch iPlayer from other countries using a TOR network for free. These idiots never learn. They think they're closing a loophole, but it won't change a thing and they'll never release any relevant figures. MEH. Pfft.
|
|
|
Post by nob on Sept 1, 2016 18:42:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by petersmyth1 on Sept 1, 2016 22:49:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nob on Sept 2, 2016 7:09:02 GMT
No prosecco and shops own there Peter its the real stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Sept 2, 2016 15:01:30 GMT
Every download is traceable, every remark posted on this forum is recorded somewhere. GCHQ has software that monitors and flags up keywords in data packets. I wonder how many idle staff the BBC has to devote to following up every flagged up download. They would need to apply for a court order to enforce every internet service provider to reveal the identity of each download. We're talking millions of downloads here. On that website, the writer suggests that a pin would be a good idea. Oh please...Thick4rse. It does affect me because we haven't had a tele since the storm in the south east on October 15th 1987, so we'll just cease watching BBC iPlayer catch up. Just like before iPlayer came along, we'll never miss what we don't have. I can't count the number of times we've browsed through the slurry tank of programmes on offer and stifled a familiar yawn. It's not as though it affects "4 on demand" and the like either, so this "initiative" has broken the principle of licensing the premises with the equipment because it is apothecating the revenue specifically for the BBC. The government can sit on the rough end of a pineapple and rotate. As usual, it only affects the law abiders. Just think, you can watch iPlayer from other countries using a TOR network for free. These idiots never learn. They think they're closing a loophole, but it won't change a thing and they'll never release any relevant figures. MEH. Pfft. The thing is, they reckon that they prosecute ( 200,117 people charged for TV licence offences in 2015,)I don't know a single person who has ever been charged. After asking my pals, it seems that none of them do either! Strange that.
|
|
|
Post by banjo on Sept 2, 2016 16:06:57 GMT
This is the same altruistic organisation that generously charges blind people a reduced TV licence fee right?
|
|