|
Post by nob on Jul 3, 2016 15:25:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by duyuthinkysaurus on Jul 3, 2016 16:49:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Jul 3, 2016 19:34:24 GMT
.... What a prat,htf can anyone tell a lie unknowingly?
|
|
|
Post by petersmyth1 on Jul 4, 2016 23:17:46 GMT
.... What a prat,htf can anyone tell a lie unknowingly? He can't you ass but he can be charged with telling a lie. Just assume by his ignorance he did not know what apparently everyone else knew so he wasn't lying but because of his ignorance everybody else assumed he was lying so where do you go from there?
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Jul 5, 2016 8:04:16 GMT
.... What a prat,htf can anyone tell a lie unknowingly? He can't you ass but he can be charged with telling a lie. Just assume by his ignorance he did not know what apparently everyone else knew so he wasn't lying but because of his ignorance everybody else assumed he was lying so where do you go from there?Brixton nick. Fixed
|
|
|
Post by banjo on Jul 5, 2016 14:54:30 GMT
In the unique position he occupied at the time, it's difficult to imagine that he had anything but the best intelligence at his disposal.
Also, just because you can't see something, doesn't mean it isn't or wasn't ever there.
I'm no supporter of that diluted tory twat but you know Saddam wasn't ever going to say "game's up charps, it's over here behind the dustbins"
e&oe...
|
|
|
Post by petersmyth1 on Jul 5, 2016 15:31:51 GMT
I'm no supporter of that diluted tory twat e&oe.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Aug 11, 2016 20:45:08 GMT
Anyway...it's all over the news that the Duke of Westminster who is was of the Uk's richest men, has suddenly died. Well, as he's a contemporary of mine, it seems that for much of my life that I've been reading snippets of news about about this fella. It has to be said, that unusually for such a wealthy fella, raised into the privileged aristocracy, just about every bit of news has been complementary of his character. His work with the armed services and his support for our war wounded has been outstanding, his provision of Stanford Hall in Nottinghamshire as a purpose-built rehabilitation centre for limbless vets, stands as a monument to his memory. Just goes to prove that no matter where you come from, no matter what what riches you inherit...a good bloke is a good bloke. RIP Duke...yer did good.
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Aug 15, 2016 16:20:29 GMT
I've been watching and enjoying the Rio olympics. Turns out that we are rather good at this sport thingy, nice to see our lads and lasses winning so many medals, especially as them stroppy Aussie types who used to take great delight in letting us know how they used to be better than us....now ain't! The funding of UK sports with lottery money is a policy of which I heartily approve.
|
|
|
Post by egg on Aug 16, 2016 7:27:06 GMT
I've been watching and enjoying the Rio olympics. Turns out that we are rather good at this sport thingy, nice to see our lads and lasses winning so many medals, especially as them stroppy Aussie types who used to take great delight in letting us know how they used to be better than us....now ain't! The funding of UK sports with lottery money is a policy of which I heartily approve. Mornin' Rats, It's quiet here............ I would have thought,"While the cats away" and all that !! Not much time left now to play about. Re The Olympics. What about Mo then ? He deserves a medal, Oh! wait, he got one!!! Well he did it. He'd promised his daughter Rihanna a medal “and I wasn’t going to let her down”. Brilliant. G.
|
|
|
Post by duyuthinkysaurus on Aug 16, 2016 15:00:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by petersmyth1 on Aug 16, 2016 15:42:17 GMT
Does any drinker know why as of recently there is a time delay between conviction and sentencing. Before sending a convicted criminal to jail does a judge now have to do a cell search to see if sending a criminal to prison is a viable possibility?
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Aug 16, 2016 23:03:20 GMT
Does any drinker know why as of recently there is a time delay between conviction and sentencing. Before sending a convicted criminal to jail does a judge now have to do a cell search to see if sending a criminal to prison is a viable possibility? In this case it's because there was another trial going on which could have been affected by the verdict.
|
|
|
Post by petersmyth1 on Aug 16, 2016 23:55:22 GMT
In this case it's because there was another trial going on which could have been affected by the verdict. But the judge already knew the verdict was guilty so how could any other trial have been affected by the sentence?
|
|
|
Post by Ratae on Aug 17, 2016 8:04:39 GMT
In this case it's because there was another trial going on which could have been affected by the verdict. But the judge already knew the verdict was guilty so how could any other trial have been affected by the sentence? Try to concentrate Smudger!
|
|